Leg and Femoral Neck Length Evaluation Using an Anterior Capsule Preservation Technique in Primary Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty
Keywords:Total Hip Arthroplasty, Leg length discrepancy, Femoral Neck Length, Direct Anterior Approach, Hip capsule, capsulotomy, capsulectomy, Capsulorrhaphy
Achieving correct leg and femoral neck lengths remains a challenge during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Several methods for intraoperative evaluation and restoration of leg length have been proposed, and each has inaccuracies and shortcomings. Both the supine positioning of a patient on the operating table during the direct anterior approach (DAA) THA and the preservation of the anterior capsule tissue are simple, readily available, and cost-effective strategies that can lend themselves well as potential solutions to this problem.
The joint replacement is performed through a longitudinal incision (capsulotomy) of the anterior hip joint capsule, and release of the capsular insertion from the femoral intertrochanteric line. As trial components of the prosthesis are placed, the position of the released distal capsule in relationship to its original insertion line is an excellent guide to leg length gained, lost, or left unchanged.
The radiographs of 80 consecutive primary THAs were reviewed which utilized anterior capsule preservation and direct capsular measurement as a means of assessing change in leg/femoral neck length. Preoperatively, the operative legs were 2.81 +/- 8.5 mm (SD) shorter than the nonoperative leg (range: 17.7 mm longer to 34.1 mm shorter). Postoperatively, the operative legs were 1.05 +/- 5.64 mm (SD) longer than the nonoperative leg (range: 14.9 mm longer to 13.7 mm shorter).
The preservation and re-assessment of the native anterior hip capsule in relationship to its point of release on the femur is a simple and effective means of determining leg/femoral neck length during DAA THA.
FRIBERG O. Clinical symptoms and biomechanics of lumbar spine and hip-joint in leg length inequality. Spine. 1983;8(6):643-651. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198309000-00010.
Mihalko W, Phillips M, Krackow K. Acute sciatic and femoral neuritis following total hip arthroplasty - A case report. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2001;83A(4):589-592.
Rosler J, Perka C. The effect of anatomical positional relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2000;24(1):23-27. doi: 10.1007/s002640050006.
Ranawat C. The pants too short, the leg too long! Orthopedics. 1999;22(9):845-846.
WOO R, MORREY B. Dislocations after total hip-arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 1982;64(9):1295-1306.
Amstutz H, Ma S, Jinnah R, Mai L. Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop. 2004(420):2-9.
Austin M, Hozack W, Sharkey P, Rothman R. Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(3):88-90. doi: 10.1054/arth.2003.50073.
Konyves A, Bannister G. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British Volume. 2005;87B(2):155-157. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.14878.
Wylde V, Whitehouse SL, Taylor AH, Pattison GT, Bannister GC, Blom AW. Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2009;33(4):905-909. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0563-6.
Upadhyay A, York S, Macaulay W, McGrory B, Robbennolt J, Bal BS. Medical malpractice in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.artli.2007.05.003.
Ng VY, Kean JR, Glassman AH. Limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2013;95A(15):1426-1436. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00433.
Knight J, Atwater R. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty: Quantitating it’s utility and precision. J Arthroplasty. 1992;7:403-409.
Ranawat C, Rodriguez J. Functional leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(4):359-364. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90190-X.
Charles M, Bourne R, Davey J, Greenwald A, Morrey B, Rorabeck C. Soft-tissue balancing of the hip - the role of femoral offset restoration. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2004;86A(5):1078-1088.
McArthur BA, Schueler BA, Howe BM, Trousdale RT, Taunton MJ. Radiation exposure during fluoroscopic guided direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(9):1565-1568. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.029.
Desai A, Dramis A, Board T. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: A review of literature. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6(4):336-341.
Light TR, Keggi KJ. Anterior approach to hip-arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1980(152):255-260.
Kennon R, Keggi J, Zatorski L, Keggi K. Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: Beyond the minimally invasive technique. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2004;86A:91-97.
Kennon R, Keggi J, Wetmore R, Zatorski L, Huo M, Keggi K. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2003;85A:39-48.
Alazzawi S, Douglas SL, Haddad FS. A novel intra-operative technique to achieve accurate leg length and femoral offset during total hip replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94(4):281-282.
Ahmad R, Sharma V, Sandhu H, Bishay M. Leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty with the use of cemented and uncemented femoral stems. A prospective radiological study. Hip International. 2009;19(3):264-267.
Hughes AW, Clark D, Carlino W, Gosling O, Spencer RF. Capsule repair may reduce dislocation following hip hemiarthroplasty through a direct lateral approach. Bone & Joint Journal. 2015;97B(1):141-144. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.34038.
Liebs TR, Nasser L, Herzberg W, Ruether W, Hassenpflug J. The influence of femoral offset on health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Bone & Joint Journal. 2014;96B(1):36-42.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2017 Stephen Nelson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Agreement:
Authors who publish with the Reconstructive Review agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work. Reconstructive Review follows the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC. This license allows anyone to download works, build upon the material, and share them with others for non-commercial purposes as long as they credit the senior author, Reconstructive Review, and the Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation (JISRF). An example credit would be: "Courtesy of (senior author's name), Reconstructive Review, JISRF, Chagrin Falls, Ohio". While works can be downloaded and shared they cannot be used commercially.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.