Long-Term Screening is Necessary in Patients with Metal on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • J. Ryan Martin OrthoCarolina
  • Susan Odum OrthoCarolina Research Institute
  • William Griffin OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center
Keywords: Metal on Metal, Total Hip Replacement, Screening Protocols

Abstract

Introduction: Adverse reactions to metal debris with catastrophic failures have been seen with a number of metal on metal (MoM) total hip designs. Understanding survivorship and factors associated with failure will allow for more targeted surveillance of those patients at highest risk for failure. The purpose of this study was to assess the mid to long term survivorship and specific factors associated with failure for a large cohort of a single modular MoM design.

Methods: Consecutive patients treated with a modular metal on metal bearing with a five to fourteen year follow-up were included. Clinical outcome scores and radiographic data were prospectively collected.  Failure was defined as revision of either component for any reason during the study period. Multiple implant, surgical, and patient factors were analyzed for associations with elevated ion levels or revision due to adverse reactions to metal debris.

Results: The average age at the time of surgery for the 253 patients included in the study was 55. There were 28 revisions (7.5%), eight due to metallosis (2%).   Survivorship was 89% at 12.6 years with revision for any reason as the end point. Survivorship was 93% when limited to revision for ALTR as the end point. Time in situ was the only variable that was statistically associated with an increased risk of failure due to ALTR (p<0.0001)

Conclusion: In this large series of a single design modular metal-metal total hip we found relatively low rates of revision due to adverse reactions to metal debris.  The only variable associated with a statistically significant risk of ALTR was time in situ.   Therefore, long-term surveillance is necessary in patients with a MoM THA.

References

Silverman EJ, Ashley B, Sheth NP. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: is there still a role in 2016? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med [Internet]. 2016 Mar [cited 2017 Apr 24];9(1):93–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26791173

Williams D, Royle M, Norton M. Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2009 Jan [cited 2017 Apr 24];24(1):144–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18823742

Bernthal NM, Celestre PC, Stavrakis AI, Ludington JC, Oakes DA. Disappointing short-term results with the DePuy ASR XL metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2012 Apr [cited 2016 Jul 17];27(4):539–44. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22000575

Clayton RAE, Beggs I, Salter DM, Grant MH, Patton JT, Porter DE. Inflammatory Pseudotumor Associated with Femoral Nerve Palsy Following Metal-on-Metal Resurfacing of the Hip: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect [Internet]. 2008 Sep 1 [cited 2015 Jul 1];os-90(9):1988–93. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18762660

Fricka KB, Ho H, Peace WJ, Engh CA. Metal-on-metal local tissue reaction is associated with corrosion of the head taper junction. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2012 Sep [cited 2016 Jul 17];27(8 Suppl):26–31.e1. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22554728

Madanat R, Hussey DK, Donahue GS, Potter HG, Wallace R, Bragdon C, et al. Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 2016 Jan [cited 2016 Jul 17];474(1):166–74. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26310677

Griffin WL. Metal ion levels: how can they help us? J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2014 Apr [cited 2015 Aug 15];29(4):659–60. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655610

Smolders JMH, Hol A, van Susante JLC. Metal ion trend may be more predictive for malfunctioning metal-on-metal implants than a single measurement. Hip Int [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 Jun 28];23(5):434–40. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23934907

Kiran M, Shivarathre D, Peter VK. Blood Metal Ion Levels Have Limited Utility in the Surveillance of Asymptomatic Large-Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2017 Jul 20 [cited 2017 Sep 6]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781016

Barrett WP, Kindsfater KA, Lesko JP. Large-diameter modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: incidence of revision for adverse reaction to metallic debris. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2012 Jun [cited 2017 Mar 20];27(6):976–83.e1. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883540312000630

Kindsfater KA, Sychterz Terefenko CJ, Gruen TA, Sherman CM. Minimum 5-year results of modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2012 Apr [cited 2017 Mar 20];27(4):545–50. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883540311003342

Hothi HS, Eskelinen AP, Berber R, Lainiala OS, Moilanen TPS, Skinner JA, et al. Factors Associated With Trunnionosis in the Metal-on-Metal Pinnacle Hip. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2017 Jan [cited 2017 Apr 24];32(1):286–90. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471212

Atrey A, Hart A, Hussain N, Waite J, Shepherd AJ, Young S. 601 metal-on-metal total hip replacements with 36mm heads a 5 minimum year follow up: Levels of ARMD remain low despite a comprehensive screening program. J Orthop [Internet]. 2017 Mar [cited 2017 Apr 24];14(1):108–14. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829734

Griffin WL, Fehring TK, Kudrna JC, Schmidt RH, Christie MJ, Odum SM, et al. Are Metal Ion Levels a Useful Trigger for Surgical Intervention? J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2012 Sep [cited 2018 Feb 9];27(8):32–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22608683

Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kamali A, Maggiani F, Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, et al. The correlation of wear with histological features after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet]. 2013 Jun 19 [cited 2018 Jan 31];95(12):e81. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00004623-201306190-00004

Campbell PA, Kung MS, Hsu AR, Jacobs JJ. Do Retrieval Analysis and Blood Metal Measurements Contribute to Our Understanding of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions? Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 2014 Dec 27 [cited 2017 Apr 26];472(12):3718–27. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25160942

Fehring TK, Fehring K, Odum SM. Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence MRI Abnormalities Occur in Metal-on-polyethylene Hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 2015 Feb 21 [cited 2017 Apr 26];473(2):574–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25141843

Jennings JM, Martin JR, Kim RH, Yang CC, Miner TM, Dennis DA. Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence MRI Abnormalities in Asymptomatic Patients with a Ceramic-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Replacement. J Bone Jt Surg [Internet]. 2017 Apr 5 [cited 2017 Apr 26];99(7):593–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28375892

Goldstein JM, Fehring TK, Fehring KA. Cystic Adverse Local Tissue Reactions in Asymptomatic Modular Metal-on-Metal Total Hips May Decrease Over Time. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2016 Jul [cited 2017 Apr 26];31(7):1589–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900148

Published
2019-11-15
How to Cite
Martin, J. R., Odum, S., & Griffin, W. (2019). Long-Term Screening is Necessary in Patients with Metal on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty. Reconstructive Review, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.15438/rr.9.1.225
Section
Original Article