Mechanical Performance of a Self-Unplugging Surgical Suction Instrument: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • James Stiehl, M.D.

Abstract

Introduction: Obstruction of the surgical suction instrument is a common problem in orthopaedic surgery. Previous attempts have tried to address this problem. The ‘Super Sucker’ has a screen compartment that can be unclogged upon disassembly. The Yankauer sucker has small holes in its tip that strain larger bits of debris. The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate a new gas-actuated suction instrument in which a special screen at its tip is cleared, as needed, by a rapid burst of pressurized carbon dioxide gas.

Methods: This IRB-approved, prospective, randomized study compared a gas-actuated suction instrument with the Super Sucker and Yankauer in 70 consecutive primary total joint arthroplasty cases. Outcome measures included: incidence of complete suction loss due to suction instrument obstruction; time lost while unplugging the suction instrument; number of additional suction instruments needed; and a subjective surgeon-assessed performance score (1 to 5, with 5 being most favorable) for type of suction instrument. 

Results: There were no cases in which the gas-actuated suction instrument could not be rapidly cleared of debris. The Super Sucker completely plugged in 71% of cases, requiring 67 minutes total to unplug (3.9 minutes per case, range 0 to 12 minutes). In four cases, replacement Super Suckers were required to finish the case. The Yankauer completely plugged in 47% of cases, requiring 52 minutes total to unplug (2.8 minutes per case, range 0 to 10 minutes). In three cases, replacement Yankauers were required to finish the case. The average performance score was 2.7 for the Super Sucker, 3.6 for the Yankauer, and 5 for the gas-actuated suction instrument on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being most favorable.

Discussion: This study evaluated a suction instrument in which a screen tip prevents obstruction, and a burst of pressurized carbon dioxide gas clears debris from the tip. The new suction instrument was successful in 100% of cases, with considerably less time lost compared to the other suction instruments. The gas-actuated suction tool actively and rapidly cleared obstructive debris with minimal disruption to the surgical flow. Recent clinical experience has shown the gas-actuated suction tool to be particularly enabling in the settings of tourniquet-free total knee replacement, small incision total hip replacement, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and revision total hip replacement.

Keywords: suction, total joint arthroplasty, tourniquet-less, carbon dioxide gas

References

Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Williams BM, Ford AD, Foreman K, Nunley, RM (2012) Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. JBJS 94-B(11):95-99.

Dowrick AS, Tornetta P, Obremskey WT, Dirchl DR, Bhandari M (2012) Practical research methods for orthopaedic surgeons. JBJS 94-A(4):369-374.

Fitzgibbons PG, DiGiovanni C, Hares S, Akelman E (2012) Safe tourniquet use: a review of evidence. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(5):310-319.

Goldstein WM, Gordon A, Goldstein JM, Berland K, Branson J, Sarin VK (2007) Improvement of cement mantle thickness with pressurized carbon dioxide lavage. 20th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty. Paris, France

Higgs A, McTighe T, Samuels L, Banks S, Woodgate I (2008) A radiological comparison of pressurized carbon dioxide lavage. 68th Annual Meeting of the Australian Orthopaedic Association. Tasmania, Australia.

Jones RE (2011) Total knee arthroplasty without the use of a tourniquet. Seminars in Arthroplasty 22:176-178.

Kuzmick KM, Anspach WE (1984) Surgical suction tip with filter. United States Patent No: 4,468,217.

Lassiter TE, Schroeder RA, McDonagh DL, Bolognesi MP, Sarin VK, Monk TG (2010) Intraoperative embolic events during total knee arthroplasty with use of pulsatile saline versus carbon dioxide lavage. 56th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. New Orleans, LA.

McTighe T, Reynolds HM, Matsen FA, Murray WR, Skinner HB, Guevara J, Roche K (1995) The use of carbon dioxide gas for preparation of bony surfaces in cemented total joint arthroplasty. 8th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty. San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Opie JC (2007) Suction hand-piece with variable control off/on valve. United States Patent Application No: 2007/0016136 A1.

Prusmack, CJ (2007) Suction irrigation cleaner. United States Patent Application Publication No: US2007/0213667 A1.

Watters TS, Mather RC, Browne JA, Berend KR, Lombardi AB, Bolognesi MP (2011) Analysis of proecedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Southern Orthopaedic Association 20(2):112-116.

Published
2014-03-31
How to Cite
Stiehl, M.D., J. (2014). Mechanical Performance of a Self-Unplugging Surgical Suction Instrument: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reconstructive Review - Open Access Orthopaedic Journal of Reconstructive Arthroplasty, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.15438/rr.v4i1.54
Section
Original Article