Management of Medial Collateral Ligament Injury During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
Medial collateral ligament injury during primary total knee arthroplasty is a recognised complication potentially resulting in valgus instability, suboptimal patient outcomes and a higher rate of revision or reoperation. Options for management include primary repair with or without augmentation, reconstruction or immediate conversion to prosthesis with greater constraint, in conjunction with various postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Inconsistent recommendations throughout the orthopaedic literature have made the approach to managing this complication problematic. The objective of this study was to review the available literature to date comparing intraoperative and postoperative management options for primary total knee arthroplasty complicated by recognised injury to the medial collateral ligament. This systematic literature review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (#CRD42014008866) and performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines including a PRISMA flow diagram. Five articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. Each was a retrospective, observational cohort or case series with small numbers reported, inconsistent methodology and incompletely reported outcomes. Four of the five studies managing medial collateral ligament injury during total knee arthroplasty (47/84 patients) with direct repair with or without autograft augmentation reported good outcomes with no revision or reoperation required for symptomatic instability over a follow-up period of 16 months to almost 8 years. The fifth study with a follow-up to 10 years and a high rate of conversion to unlinked semi constrained total knee arthroplasty implant (30/37 patients) reported a greater incidence of revision due to instability, in patients in whom the medial collateral ligament injury was directly repaired without added constraint. Overall balance of evidence is in favour of satisfactory outcomes without symptomatic instability following direct repair with or without augmentation of an medial collateral ligament injury recognised intraoperatively during total knee arthroplasty. An implant with greater constraint may have reduced longevity in younger, more active patients through aseptic loosening. In elderly or less mobile patients, and in situations where the medial collateral ligament repair is deemed poor quality or incomplete, an implant with greater constraint would seem prudent. In patients where direct repair with or without augmentation was used, a period of 4-6 weeks of unrestricted rehabilitation in a hinged knee brace should be followed.
Lee, G.C. and P.A. Lotke, Management of intraoperative medial collateral ligament injury during TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011. 469(1): p. 64-8.
Leopold, S.S., et al., Primary repair of intraoperative disruption of the medical collateral ligament during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001. 83-A(1): p. 86-91.
Stephens, S., et al., Repair of medial collateral ligament injury during total knee arthoplasty. Orthopedics, 2012. 35(2): p. e154-9.
Winiarsky, R., P. Barth, and P. Lotke, Total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1998. 80(12): p. 1770-4.
Healy, W.L., et al., Complications of total knee arthroplasty: standardized list and definitions of the Knee Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013. 471(1): p. 215-20.
Munjal, S.a.K., KA Surgery of the Medial Collateral Ligament in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacements. Medscape Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine eJournal, 2000. 4.
Jung, K.A., et al., Quadriceps tendon free graft augmentation for a midsubstance tear of the medial collateral ligament during total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 2009. 16(6): p. 479-83.
Saeki, K., et al., Stability after medial collateral ligament release in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001(392): p. 184-9.
Donaldson, W.F., 3rd, et al., Total condylar III knee prosthesis. Long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988(226): p. 21-8.
Hartford, J.M., et al., Complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the condylar constrained prosthesis: an average 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 1998. 13(4): p. 380-7.
Lachiewicz, P.F. and S.P. Falatyn, Clinical and radiographic results of the Total Condylar III and Constrained Condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1996. 11(8): p. 916-22.
Easley, M.E., et al., Primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for the arthritic valgus knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000(380): p. 58-64.
Koo, M.H. and C.H. Choi, Conservative treatment for the intraoperative detachment of medial collateral ligament from the tibial attachment site during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2009. 24(8): p. 1249-53.
Dimitris, K., B.C. Taylor, and R.N. Steensen, Excursion of oscillating saw blades in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2010. 25(1): p. 158-60.
Pritsch, M., R.H. Fitzgerald, Jr., and R.S. Bryan, Surgical treatment of ligamentous instability after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1984. 102(3): p. 154-8.
Kavolus, C.H., et al., The total condylar III knee prosthesis in elderly patients. J Arthroplasty, 1991. 6(1): p. 39-43.
Barton, T.M., J.S. Torg, and M. Das, Posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A review of the literature. Sports Med, 1984. 1(6): p. 419-30.
Kannus, P., et al., Injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Sports Med, 1991. 12(2): p. 110-31.
Copyright (c) 2014 Paul Della Torre, MD, Andrew Stephens, MD, Horng Lii Oh, MD, Akshay Kamra, MD, Bernard Zicat, MD, Peter Walker, MD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Agreement:
Authors who publish with the Reconstructive Review agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work. Reconstructive Review follows the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC. This license allows anyone to download works, build upon the material, and share them with others for non-commercial purposes as long as they credit the senior author, Reconstructive Review, and the Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation (JISRF). An example credit would be: "Courtesy of (senior author's name), Reconstructive Review, JISRF, Chagrin Falls, Ohio". While works can be downloaded and shared they cannot be used commercially.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.