Improving Pre-Operative Flexion in Primary TKA: A Surgical Technique Emphasizing Knee Flexion with 5-Year Follow-Up
This study prospectively reviews a consecutive series of 228 primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures utilizing a technique to optimize knee flexion. The main features include: (1)the use of a “patellar friendly” femoral component and reduced thickness patellar components, (2) patient individualized adjustment of the femoral component rotation set strictly to the anterior-posterior femoral axis, (3)a rigorous flexion compartment debridement to remove non-essential posterior femoral bone with a Z-osteotome, and (4)incorporation of a rapid recovery protocol with features to promote knee flexion.
Results were categorized into three groups: low pre-op flexion (90 degrees and below), regular pre-op flexion (91-125 degrees), and high pre-op flexion (126 degrees and above). Average flexion in the low flexion group improved by 20 degrees at 6 weeks, 28 degrees at 3 months, 31 degrees at 1 year, and 30 degrees at 5 years. In the regular flexion group, average flexion improved by 2 degrees at 6 weeks, 10 degrees at 3 months, 12 degrees at 1 year, and 13 degrees at 5 years. Finally, in the high flexion group, average flexion decreased by 7 degrees at 6 weeks, regained preoperative levels at 3 months, and increased by 3 degrees at 1 year and 4 degrees at 5 years.
In summary, a technique that emphasizes patellofemoral kinematics can consistently improve flexion in TKA in short and long-term follow-up.
Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, range of motion, high flexion, surgical technique, implant design, AP Axis
Level of Evidence: AAOS Therapeutic Study Level III
Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Mahfouz M, et al. A high flexion total knee arthroplasty design replicates healthy knee motion. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428: 174-9.
Argenson JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, et al. In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomechanics. 2005; 38: 277-84.
Arima J, Whiteside L, McCarthy D, White S. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee: A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77: 1331-4.
Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, et al. A fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002; 84B: 50-3.
Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J. The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery Sposts Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 13(3): 193-6.
Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH. Rapid recovery protocol for peri-operative care of total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. Surg Technol Int. 2004; 13: 239-47.
Bonutti PM, Mont MA, Mcmahon M. Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2004; 86: 26-32.
Chiu KY, Tang WM, Yau WP. Review article: Knee Flexion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2002; 10(2): 194-202.
Christen B, Heester beek PV, Wymenga A. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Balancing in Total Knee Replacement, the quantitative relationship between tightness of the fexion gap and tibial translation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2007; 89-B: 1046-50.
Emerson RH Jr, Ayers C, Head WC, Higgins LL. Surgical closing in primary total knee arthroplasties: flexion versus extension. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 331: 74-80.
Ethgen O, Bruvere O, Richy F, Dardenned C, Reginster JY. Health related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A(5): 963-74.
Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(2): 163-73.
Healy WL, Iorio R, Ko J, Appleby D, Lemos DW. Impact of cost reduction programs on short term patient outcome and hospital cost of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84-A(3): 348-53.
Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ, et al. The early results of high flexion total knee arthroplasty. A minimum of 2 years follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(5): 674-9.
Jones CA, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME. Total joint arthroplasties: Current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Clin Geriatr Med. 2005; 21(3): 527-41.
Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS. Range of motion of standard and high flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005; 87(7): 1470-5.
Kotani A, Yonekura A, Bourne RB. Factors influencing range of motion after contemporary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(7): 850-6.
Kumar PJ, McPherson EJ, Dorr LD, Wan Z, Baldwin K. Rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of 2 rehabilitation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 331: 93-101.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(4): 780-5.
Laskin RS, Beksac B, Pittors K. Minimally Invasive Total Knee Replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: An Outcome Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 428: 74-81.
McPherson EJ: Patellar tracking in primary total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2006; 55: 439-48.
Mihalko W, Fishkin Z, Krakow K. Patellofemoral overstuff and its relationship to flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 449: 283-7.
Peters CL, Mulkey P, Erickson J. Comparison of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Highly Congruent Anterior Stabilized Bearings versus a Cruciate-retaining Design. Clin Ortho Relat Res. 2013; 1528-1132. Available from: Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. Accessed July 15, 2013.
Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 331: 35-46.
Ranawat CS. Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 416: 174-6.
Rice DP, Fineman N. Economic implications of increased longevity in the United States. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004; 25: 457-73.
Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, et al. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A(7): 1278-85.
Ritter MA, Albohm MJ, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10(6): 737-41.
Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S, Li G, Rubash HE. Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: Advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 416: 167-73.
Whiteside L, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 321: 168-72.
Copyright (c) 2014 Edward McPherson, MD FACS, Denise Portugal, MD, Matthew Dipane, BA, Sherif Sherif, MD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Agreement:
Authors who publish with the Reconstructive Review agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work. Reconstructive Review follows the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC. This license allows anyone to download works, build upon the material, and share them with others for non-commercial purposes as long as they credit the senior author, Reconstructive Review, and the Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation (JISRF). An example credit would be: "Courtesy of (senior author's name), Reconstructive Review, JISRF, Chagrin Falls, Ohio". While works can be downloaded and shared they cannot be used commercially.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.