Early Experience with a Modern Generation Knee System: Average 2 Years’ Follow-up
Keywords:Total Knee Arthroplasty, Total knee replacement, Knee Prosthesis, Treatment Outcome, Single radius, Joint line preservation
AbstractArthritis in the knee is a leading cause of pain and disability with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often the treatment of choice after failure of more conservative treatments. TKA has been demonstrated to be one of the most successful procedures performed. However, despite the good long-term survivorship rates, patient satisfaction is still an issue post TKA with over 20% of patients exhibiting patient dissatisfaction most commonly due to anterior knee pain (over 18-28% patients) and mediolateral or varus-valgus instability. Recent studies have demonstrated that collateral ligament strains are altered post TKA which may lead to laxity and/or tightness of the ligaments resulting in patient discomfort, pain, stiffness and/or instability post TKA. As a result, it may be beneficial to ensure ligamentous strains after TKA are similar or close to the native situation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of the Unity Knee™ Total Knee System (Corin Ltd, Cirencester, UK), a modern generation, single-radius total knee replacement (TKR) and its accompanying instrumentation which is designed to help maintain proper ligament balance and restore the medial jointline. A total of 89 knees (89 patients) were implanted with the device in a single surgeon series. All patients were assessed using the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and radiographs. There was 1 revision due to infection and Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 98.9% at 2 years. The mean AKSS knee score for the total cohort was 87.1 ± 7.98 and the mean Oxford Knee score was 45.89 + 3.69. Radiographic review found no signs of radiographic failure in any of the knees. This study demonstrates good survivorship, clinical, and radiographic results at 2 years for this TKR.
Borrione F, Bonnevialle P, Mabit C, Guingand O, Bertin D, Bonnomet F, et al. Scorpio single radius total knee arthroplasty. A minimal five-year follow-up multicentric study. Int Orthop 2011;35(12): 1777-82.
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. OrthoInfo.Total Knee Replacement [internet]. 2011 Dec [cited 2014 Dec 22]. Available from: http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=A00389
Maratt J, Lee Y, Lyman S, Westrich G. Predictors of Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. In Press. EPub 2015 Jan 30th.
Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop. 2010;468(1):57-63.
Fehring TK, Valadie AL. Knee instability after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994;(299):157-62.
Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2001;(392):315-8.
Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop. 2002;(404):7-13.
Delport H, Labey L, Innocenti B, De Corte R, Vander Sloten J, Bellemans J. Restoration of constitutional alignment in TKA leads to more physiological strains in the collateral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. EPub 2014 Apr 6th.
Provenzano PP, Heisey D, Hayashi K, Lakes R, Vanderby R Jr. Subfailure damage in ligament: a structural and cellular evaluation. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92(1):362-71.
Howell SM, Howell SJ, Hull ML. Assessment of the radii of the medial and lateral femoral condyles in varus and valgus knees with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(1):98-104.
Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop. 1993;(290):259-68.
Banks SA, Hodge WA. Implant design affects knee arthroplasty kinematics during stair-stepping. Clin Orthop. 2004;(426):187-93.
Mahoney OM, McClung CD, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The effect of total knee arthroplasty design on extensor mechanism function. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4):416-21.
Dixon S, Blom AW, Whitehouse MR, Wylde V. Comparison of patient reported outcomes after Triathlon(®) and Kinemax Plus prostheses. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96(1):61-6.
Cook LE, Klika AK, Szubski CR, Rosneck J, Molloy R, Barsoum WK. Functional outcomes used to compare single radius and multiradius of curvature designs in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2012;25(3):249-53.
Hall J, Copp S, Adelson W, D’Lima D, Colwell C. Extensor mechanism function in single-radius vs multi-radius femoral components for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(2):216-9.
Jo AR, Song EK, Lee KB, Seo HY, Kim SK, Seon JK. A comparison of stability and clinical outcomes in single-radius versus multi-radius femoral design for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2014 Dec;29(12):2402-6.
Wolterbeek N, Nelissen RG, Valstar ER. No differences in in vivo kinematics between six different types of knee prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(3):559-64.
Victor J, Wong P, Witvrouw E, Sloten JV, Bellemans J. How isometric are the medial patellofemoral, superficial medial collateral and lateral collateral ligament of the knee? Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):2028-36.
Grood ES, Noyes FR, Butler DL, Suntay WJ. Ligamentous and capsular restraints preventing straight medial and lateral laxity in intact human cadaver knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(8):1257-1269.
Feeley BT, Muller MS, Allen AA, Granchi CC, Pearle AD. Biomechanical comparison of medial collateral ligament reconstructions using computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(6):1123-1130.
Abolghasemian M, Samiezadeh S, Sternheim A, Bougherara H, Barnes CL, Backstein DJ. Effect of patellar thickness on knee flexion in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical and experimental study. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(1):80-4.
Molt M, Toksvig-Larsen S. Similar early migration when comparing CR and PS in Triathlonâ„¢ TKA: A prospective randomised RSA trial. The Knee Journal. 2014;21(5):949-54.
Sur YJ, Koh IJ, Park SW, Kim HJ, In Y. Condylar-Stabilizing Tibial Inserts Do Not Restore Anteroposterior Stability After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. In Press. EPub 2014 26th Nov.
Baker PN, Petheram T, Dowen D, Jameson SS, Avery PJ, Reed MR et al. Early PROMs following total knee arthroplasty--functional outcome dependent on patella resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(2):314-9.
Chen K, Li G, Fu D, Yuan C, Zhang Q, Cai Z. Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int Orthop. 2013;37(6):1075-83.
Snir N, Schwarzkopf R, Diskin B, Takemoto R, Hamula M, Meere PA. Incidence of patellar clunk syndrome in fixed versus high-flex mobile bearing posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(10):2021-4.
National Joint Registry England Wales and Northern Ireland, Implant Summary Report for Corin Unity Knee, dated 9 August 215. Ref: Summary.Report KP_Femoral _Unity_.11-08-2015.
Martin A, Quah C, Sime G, Lammin K, Segaren N, Pickering S. Long term survivorship following Scorpio Total Knee Replacement. The Knee Journal. 2015:22(3):192-6.
Arnout N, VanIommel L, VanIommel J, Luyckx JP, Labey L, Innocenti B, Victor J, Bellemans J. Post-cam mechanics and tibiofemoral kinematics: a dynamic in vitro analysis of eight posterior-stabilized total knee designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015:23(11):3343-53.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2016 Thomas Paszicsnyek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Agreement:
Authors who publish with the Reconstructive Review agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work. Reconstructive Review follows the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC. This license allows anyone to download works, build upon the material, and share them with others for non-commercial purposes as long as they credit the senior author, Reconstructive Review, and the Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation (JISRF). An example credit would be: "Courtesy of (senior author's name), Reconstructive Review, JISRF, Chagrin Falls, Ohio". While works can be downloaded and shared they cannot be used commercially.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.