Bone Preservation in a Novel Patient Specific Total Knee Replacement.

  • William B. Kurtz Tennessee Orthopedic Alliance, Nashville, TN,
  • John E. Slamin ConforMIS Inc., Bedford, MA
  • Scott W. Doody ConforMIS Inc., Bedford, MA
Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, bone resection, bone preservation, patient-specific implant

Abstract

Background: The volume of total knee arthroplasty procedures is growing rapidly and, correspondingly, it is expected that the volume of revision procedures will grow rapidly as well.  Revision surgery is most successful when adequate bone remains on both the tibia and femur to allow for the least invasive revision. 
We hypothesized that total knee arthroplasty with a patient-specific implant would result in significant bone preservation as compared to standard total knee arthroplasty with “off-the-shelf” implants.
Methods: We evaluated 100 total knee arthroplasties which utilized patient-specific implants, versus 37 standard posterior stabilized and 32 standard posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties.  Bone resection was quantified utilizing intra-operative measurements of actual resected bone. Additionally we performed a virtual, CAD-based analysis of resections via CT imaging on 15 knees. 
Findings: We found that patients had significantly less bone resected in all zones measured, on both the femur and tibia, when patient-specific implants with patient-specific jigs were used.  When assessed volumetrically with CAD imaging, standard implants resected 12-49% more bone than did patient-specific implants, depending on the size of the implant utilized.
Interpretations: Utilizing patient-specific implants in total knee arthroplasty results in significant bone sparing as compared to standard total knee arthroplasty. This has the potential for less invasive revision surgery in the future, possibly obviating the need for dedicated revision implants or augments and other bone substituting devices.

Author Biographies

William B. Kurtz, Tennessee Orthopedic Alliance, Nashville, TN,

William. B. Kurtz, M.D.

Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance

John E. Slamin, ConforMIS Inc., Bedford, MA

Sr. Vice President of Engineering

ConforMIS

Scott W. Doody, ConforMIS Inc., Bedford, MA

Design Engineer II

ConforMIS Inc.

References

S. Kurtz, K. Ong, E. Lau, F. Mowat, M. Halpern, Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89 (2007) 780-785.

M.A. Mont, T.M. Seyler, P.S. Ragland, R. Starr, J. Erhart, A. Bhave, Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty 22 (2007) 100-108

D.L. Bartel, V.L. Bicknell, T.M. Wright, The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 68 (1986) 1041-1051

R.A. Bojarski, R. Ketelholn, B.S. Parsley, J.E. Slamin, Optimizing knee femoral component strength and bone preservation with finite element analysis, 58th Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society (2012) Poster No. 1042

W.A. Hodge, Intraoperative assessment of bone cuts to guide surgical technique during total knee arthroplasty, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89 (2007) 137-43

Published
2016-04-26
How to Cite
Kurtz, W. B., Slamin, J. E., & Doody, S. W. (2016). Bone Preservation in a Novel Patient Specific Total Knee Replacement. Reconstructive Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15438/rr.6.1.133
Section
Clinical/Surgical