Rotational Alignment of the Femoral Component in Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
This study compared two Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) methods in 212 total knee arthroplasties to evaluate the differences between anatomic landmark axes in determining rotational position of the femoral component. Overall, there were large variations between CAS defined component orientation using an optimized gap-balancing technique and component orientation using anatomic reference axes (range, 16º internal rotation to 16º external rotation). If based on anatomic landmarks, these large variations would have led to asymmetrical flexion gaps in up to 60% of the knees studied. Of the anatomic axes studied, the posterior condylar axis was the only axis not significantly different from CAS optimized orientation. If anatomic landmarks are used for femoral component rotation with either a conventional or a CAS technique, asymmetric trapezoidal flexion gaps may result.
Key Words: total knee arthroplasty, balancing, component rotation, Computer Assisted Surgery
Lonner JH, Lotke PA. Aseptic Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999; 7(5): 311-324.
Dixon MC, Brown RR, Parsch D, Scott RD. Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar;87(3):598-603.
Vessely MB, Whaley AL, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:28-34.
Tarkin IS, Bridgeman JT, Jardon OM, Garvin KL. Successful biologic fixation with mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Jun;20(4):481-6.
Archibeck MJ, and White Jr. RE. What’s New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 2002; 84-A: 1719-1726.
Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, and Myers L. Component Rotation and Anteriror Knee Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; 392: 46-55.
Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT. The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Feb;(287):170-7.
Fehring TK. Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Nov;(380):72-9.
Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Sep;(426):180-6.
Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Aug;85(6):830-5.
Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Jul;86(5):682-7.
Katz MA, Beck TD, Silber JS, Seldes RM and Lotke PA. Determining Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(3): 301-305.
Jenny JY, Boeri C. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Feb;75(1):74-7.
Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec;(321):168-72.
Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jan;(286):40-7.
Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Oct;87(10):2276-80.
Kinzel V, Ledger M, Shakespeare D. Can the epicondylar axis be defined accurately in total knee arthroplasty? The Knee 2005 12: 293-296.
Copyright (c) 2014 Mark Clatworthy, MD, Kimberly Lindberg, MD, Walter Wray III, MD, Christi Sychterz Terefenko, MS, Douglas Dennis, MD, David Pollock, MD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Agreement:
Authors who publish with the Reconstructive Review agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work. Reconstructive Review follows the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC. This license allows anyone to download works, build upon the material, and share them with others for non-commercial purposes as long as they credit the senior author, Reconstructive Review, and the Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation (JISRF). An example credit would be: "Courtesy of (senior author's name), Reconstructive Review, JISRF, Chagrin Falls, Ohio". While works can be downloaded and shared they cannot be used commercially.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.