Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Past, Present, Future
For over fifty years, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been used to treat single compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Despite the many years of experience performing UKA, the orthopaedic community has not reached a consensus on the patient selection criteria or operative indications for UKA, due to varied outcome results in the literature. Newly designed robotic-assisted systems are believed to increase the precision and accuracy with which unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can be performed, possibly leading to fewer mechanical failures and improved functional outcomes. However, long-term follow-up is required before definitive conclusions can be reached regarding this new technology. This review examines the history of UKA, reviews early results of robotic-assisted UKA and presents an outlook on
Key Words: unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, total knee, robotic assisted
Kurtz SM. The Origins and Adaptations of UHMWPE for Knee Replacement, Biomaterials Handbook, Chapter 7, Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1995
Hardinge K. Revision of total knee arthroplasty, Chapter 18.2 in Knee Surgery Current Practice, Martin Duntz Limited 1992
Minns RJ, Hardinge K. Failure of one design of surface replacement knee arthroplasty due to loosening deformation and wear of the plastic femoral component. Biomaterials, 4(3): 147-52, 1983.
Bert JM. Unicompartmental knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am, 36(4): 513-22, 2005.
Conditt MA, Roche MW. Minimally invasive robotic-arm-guided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91 Suppl 1: 63-8, 2009.
Lonner JH. Patellofemoral Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 15(8): 495-506, 2007.
Product Development, Bechtol; www.jisrf.org.
Cannon A, Stolley M, Wolf B, Amendola A. Patellofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty: literature review and description of a novel technique. The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 28: 42-8, 2008.
Laskin RS. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 60(2): 182-5, 1978.
Pearle AD. Kendoff D, Stueber V, Musahl V, Repicci JA. Perioperative management of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using the MAKO robotic arm system (MAKOplasty). Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 38(2 Suppl): 16-9, 2009.
Insall J, Aglietti P. A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 62(8): 1329-37, 1980.
Richards Manufacturing Co., 1975 Corp. Announcement “IT IS WITH A DEEP SENSE OF OBLIGATION TO YOU ...”.
Vossler v. Richards Manufacturing Co. (1983) 143 Cal.App.3d 952 [192 Cal.Rptr. 219].
Treace v. Marmor, 644 F.2d 887 (6th Cir. 01/08/1981) HARRY T. TREACE AND RICHARD’S MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. LEONARD MARMOR, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA. Contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: fixed vs mobile bearing. J Arthroplasty, 23(7 Suppl): 24-7, 2008.
Marmor L. The modular knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (94): 242-8, 1973.
Marmor L. Surgical insertion of the modular knee. RN, 36(9): OR1-6, 1973.
Tanavalee A, Choi YJ, Tria AJ. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: past and present. Orthopedics, 28(12): 1423-33; quiz 1434-5, 2005.
Marmor L. The Modular (Marmor) knee: case report with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (120): 86-94, 1976.
Marmor L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ten- to 13-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (226): 14-20, 1988.
Marmor L. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum ten-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (228): 171-7, 1988.
Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A, Selvik G. Cold flow reduced by metal backing. An in vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of unicompartmental tibial components. Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 61(1): 21-5, 1990.
Broughton NS, Newman JH, Baily RA. Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study after 5-10 years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 68(3): 447-52, 1986.
Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80(6): 983-9, 1998.
Bert JM. 10-year survivorship of metal-backed, unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 13(8): 901-5, 1998.
Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, Harris S, Jakopec M, Rodriguez F, Barrett A, Davies B. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88(2): 188-97, 2006.
Borus T, Thornhill T. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 16(1): 9-18, 2008.
Lonner JH. Indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and rationale for robotic arm-assisted technology. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 38(2 Suppl): 3-6, 2009.
Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental osteoarthrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77(2): 278-92, 1995.
Kozinn SC, Marx C, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A 4.5-6-year follow-up study with a metal-backed tibial component. J Arthroplasty, 4 Suppl: S1-10, 1989.
Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 71(1): 145-50, 1989.
Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Adams JB, Groseth KL. Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 440: 60-6, 2005.
Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A, Rougraff BT. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (286): 154-9, 1993.
Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A(10): 1968-73, 2003.
Lonner JH. Introduction: robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 38(2 Suppl): 2, 2009.
Lonner JH. Robotic Arm-Assisted Unicompartmental Arthroplasty. Seminars in Arthroplasty, 20(1): 15-22, 2009.
Pearle AD, Kendoff D, Musahl V. Perspectives on computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: movement toward quantitative orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91 Suppl 1: 7-12, 2009.
Stern SH, Becker MW, Insall JN. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (286): 143-8, 1993.
Laskin RS. Unicompartmental knee replacement: some unanswered questions. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (392): 267-71, 2001.
Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S, Jenkins C, Dodd CA. and Murray, D. W.: Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89(12): 1602-7, 2007.
Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Morris MJ, Hurst JM, Kavolus JJ. Does preoperative patellofemoral joint state affect medial unicompartmental arthroplasty survival? Orthopedics, 34(9): e494-6, 2011.
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Smith G, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Murray DW. Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 93(5): 622-8, 2011.
Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J. Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (205): 21-42, 1986.
Beard DJ, Pandit H, Gill HS, Hollinghurst D, Dodd CA, Murray DW. The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89(12): 1597-601, 2007.
Pearle AD, O’Loughlin PF, Kendoff DO. Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 25(2): 230-7, 2010.
Roche M, O’Loughlin PF, Kendoff D, Musahl V, Pearle AD. Robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: preoperative planning and surgical technique. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 38(2 Suppl): 10-5, 2009.
Hoffman M. MAKO Robotics Yearly Numbers for Unicompartmenal Knee Arthroplasty. Edited by Floyd, A. J., Fort Wayne, 2010.
Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, McGlynn FJ. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty, 23(3): 408-12, 2008.
The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Edited, Helse-Bergen HF, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, 2010.
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. In Annual Report. Edited by Association, A. O., Adelaide, 2010.
Swank ML, Alkire M, Conditt M, Lonner JH. Technology and cost-effectiveness in knee arthroplasty: computer navigation and robotics. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 38(2 Suppl): 32-6, 2009.
Jenny JY, Ciobanu E, Boeri C. The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 463: 58-62, 2007.
Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80(5): 862-5, 1998.
Bert J. Analysis of unicompartmental arthroplasty in a community based registry. In American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Edited, Dallas, TX, 2002.
Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87(11): 1480-2, 2005.
Hinarejos P, Corrales M, Matamalas A, Bisbe E, Caceres E. Computer-assisted surgery can reduce blood loss after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 17(4): 356-60, 2009.
Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (273): 151-6, 1991.
Dalury DF, Fisher DA, Adams MJ, Gonzales RA. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compares favorably to total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Orthopedics, 32(4), 2009.
Patil S, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA, D’Lima DD. Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87(2): 332-8, 2005.
Hopper GP, Leach WJ. Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 16(10): 973-9, 2008.
Sinha RK. Outcomes of robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 38(2 Suppl): 20-2, 2009.
Banks SA, Harman MK, Hodge WA. Mechanism of anterior impingement damage in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84-A Suppl 2: 37-42, 2002.
Hernigou P, Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (423): 161-5, 2004.
Hernigou P, Deschamps G. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86-A(3): 506-11, 2004.
Li G, Papannagari R, Most E, Park SE, Johnson T, Tanamal L, Rubash HE. Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res, 23(3): 536-41, 2005.
Mariani EM, Bourne MH, Jackson, RT, Jackson ST, Jones P. Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 22(6 Suppl 2): 81-4, 2007.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2014 Johannes Plate, MD, Ali Mofidi, MB, BAO, BCh, Sandeep Mannava, MD, PhD, Cara Lorentzen, MD, Beth Smith, PhD, Thorsten Seyler, MD, Timothy McTighe, Dr. HS, Riyaz Jinnah, MD, F.R.C.S.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Agreement:
Authors who publish with the Reconstructive Review agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work. Reconstructive Review follows the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC. This license allows anyone to download works, build upon the material, and share them with others for non-commercial purposes as long as they credit the senior author, Reconstructive Review, and the Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation (JISRF). An example credit would be: "Courtesy of (senior author's name), Reconstructive Review, JISRF, Chagrin Falls, Ohio". While works can be downloaded and shared they cannot be used commercially.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.