Correction of Femoral Acetabular Impingement at the Time of Primary THA

Authors

  • Edward J. McPherson LA Orthopedic Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  • Sherif M. Sherif LA Orthopedic Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  • Madhav Chowdhry LA Orthopedic Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  • Matthew V. Dipane LA Orthopedic Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15438/rr.8.1.206

Keywords:

THA, Total Hip Arthroplasty, FAI, Femoral Acetabular Impingement, PFAI, Prosthetic Femoral Acetabular Impingement, Hip Subluxation, Anterior Hip Decompression, AABWR, Anterior Acetabular Bone Wall Reduction, Groin Pain, Hip Flexion

Abstract

Background: Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered one of the most cost effective and functionally beneficial procedures to treat end-stage coxarthrosis worldwide. However, in all regions of the world, there is a small percentage of patients that are plagued by residual anterior hip pain and have limited hip flexion. One explanation for this problem is bone and soft tissue impingement in the anterior hip region. In the native hip, the problem is described as femoral acetabular impingement (FAI). FAI is a form of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Not infrequently, these dysplastic acetabula are also retroverted. In primary THA, a retroverted boney acetabulum adversely affects prosthetic hip function. Specifically, when the acetabular cup is inserted in an anteverted position and the native acetabulum is retroverted, the proximal femur will still impinge upon the retroverted acetabular bone with flexion and internal rotation. This causes mechanical instability, pain, and prosthetic subluxation. We aptly name this condition prosthetic femoral acetabular impingement (PFAI).

Methods: In this study we address PFAI with an anterior acetabular bone wall reduction (AABWR). In a consecutive series of 426 primary THA’s, we prospectively removed all impinging anterior retroverted bone during the THA procedure. All acetabular cups were placed between 25-35 degrees of anteversion. Retroverted acetabular bone extending beyond the acetabular cup was removed along with impinging capsular tissues. All femoral stems were positioned between 15-20 degrees.

Results: The study group consisted of 426 THA’s. Three hundred patients (70%) had an AABWR. There were 140 females (47%) and 160 males (53%). The average amount of bone resected in the AABWR group was 1.32 cm (0.3 cm to 3.4 cm). For females, the average bone resection measured 1.1 cm (0.3 to 2.0 cm). For males, the average bone resection measured 1.53 cm (0.3 cm to 3.4 cm). Harris Hip Scores (HHS) at minimum of 1 year follow-up (range 1 to 11.5 years) averaged 91 (64 to 100) for the entire group. In the AABWR group, HHS averaged 92 (71 to 100). Average hip flexion was 110 degrees (100 to 130 degrees). In the non-AABWR group, HHS averaged 87 (71 to 100). Average flexion was 109 degrees (88 to 125 degrees). In the AABWR group, 12 patients (4%) experienced groin pain symptoms. On a scale from 0 to 4, the peak groin pain rating was 1 in 10 of the 12 patients and the remaining 2 rated his/her pain at a 2. As time progressed, 50% of these patients saw their groin pain resolve. In the non-AABWR group, 2 patients (1.6%) experienced groin pain and both patients rated his/her pain at a 1.

Discussion: Maximizing hip flexion and function for the active patient undergoing primary THA requires meticulous surgical technique. PFAI may be one reason for unexplained anterior hip pain in the highly active patient that demands higher hip flexion and rotation. Our experience shows that the anterior acetabular rim and part of the anterior column can be removed at the time of primary THA without compromising the THA procedure. The AABWR is now an integral part of our primary THA technique.

Author Biographies

Edward J. McPherson, LA Orthopedic Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States

M.D., F.A.C.S.

Sherif M. Sherif, LA Orthopedic Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States

M.D.

Madhav Chowdhry, LA Orthopedic Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States

MBBS

Matthew V. Dipane, LA Orthopedic Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States

B.A.

References

Anderson LA, Peters CL, Park BB, Stoddard GJ, Erickson JA, Crim JR. Acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement. Risk factors and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(2): 305-13.

Leunig M, Ganz R. [FAI - concept and etiology]. Orthopade. 2009; 38(5): 394-401.

Mamisch TC, Werlen S, Zilkens C, Trattnig S, Kim YJ, Siebenrock KA, et al. Radiological diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement. Radiologe. 2009; 49(5): 425-33.

Clohisy JC, St John LC, Schutz AL. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(2): 555-64.

Peters CL, Schabel K, Anderson L, Erickson J. Open treatment of femoroacetabular impingement is associated with clinical improvement and low complication rate at short-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(2): 504-10.

Peters CL, Erickson JA. Treatment of Femoro-Acetabular Impingement with Surgical Dislocation and Débridement in Young Adults. JBJS. 2006; 88(8): 1735-41.

Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(8): 1832-42.

Ranawac CS, Maynard MJ. Modern technique of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 1991; 6(3): 17-25.

Lazennec JY, Riwan A, Gravez F, Rousseau MA, Mora N, Gorin M, et al. Hip spine relationships: application to total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2007; 17 Suppl 5: S91-104.

Kurtz WB, Ecker TM, Reichmann WM, Murphy SB. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(4): 624-34 e1-2.

Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(7): 847-51.

Clarke IC, Manley MT, Implant Wear Symposium Engineering Work G. How do alternative bearing surfaces influence wear behavior? J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16 Suppl 1: S86-93.

Manaka M, Clarke IC, Yamamoto K, Shishido T, Gustafson A, Imakiire A. Stripe wear rates in alumina THR--comparison of microseparation simulator study with retrieved implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 69(2): 149-57.

Walter WL, Insley GM, Walter WK, Tuke MA. Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings: stripe wear. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(4): 402-13.

Yamamoto T, Saito M, Ueno M, Hananouchi T, Tokugawa Y, Yonenobu K. Wear analysis of retrieved ceramic-on-ceramic articulations in total hip arthroplasty: Femoral head makes contact with the rim of the socket outside of the bearing surface. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 73(2): 301-7.

Hoppenfeld S, de Boer P, Buckley R. Surgical Exposures in Orthopaedics: The Anatomic Approach. 5th ed. Philadephia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.

Sutherland T, Beloff J, Lightowler M, Liu X, Nascimben L, Kaye AD, et al. Description of a multidisciplinary initiative to improve SCIP measures related to pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis compliance: a single-center success story. Patient Saf Surg. 2014; 8(1): 37.

Parvizi J, Gehrke T, International Consensus Group on Periprosthetic Joint I. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(7): 1331.

Gondi G, Roberson JR, Ganey TM, Shahriari A, Hutton WC. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion. J South Orthop Assoc. 1997; 6(4): 266-72.

Beldame J, Carreras F, Oger P, Beaufils P. Cementless cups do not increase osteolysis risk in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Apropos of 106 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95(7): 478-90.

Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys. 2007; 29(4): 465-71.

Pandit H, Vlychou M, Whitwell D, Crook D, Luqmani R, Ostlere S, et al. Necrotic granulomatous pseudotumours in bilateral resurfacing hip arthoplasties: evidence for a type IV immune response. Virchows Arch. 2008; 453(5): 529-34.

Harvie P, Giele H, Fang C, Ansorge O, Ostlere S, Gibbons M, et al. The treatment of femoral neuropathy due to pseudotumour caused by metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2008; 18(4): 313-20.

McPherson EJ, Dipane MV, Sherif SM. Massive Pseudotumor in a 28mm Ceramic-Polyethylene Revision THA: A Case Report. Reconstructive Review. 2014; 4(1): 11-7.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-16

How to Cite

McPherson, E. J., Sherif, S. M., Chowdhry, M., & Dipane, M. V. (2018). Correction of Femoral Acetabular Impingement at the Time of Primary THA. Reconstructive Review, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15438/rr.8.1.206

Issue

Section

Original Article