Techniques of Insertion and Early Clinical Impressions with a Short Curved Tissue Sparing Implant for Total Hip Arthroplasty (The French Experience)
Keywords:Tissue Sparing Implant, short curved neck preserving stem, total hip arthroplasty, bone remodeling
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most effective orthopedic procedures, providing consistently high success rates across all population segments as measured by pain relief, improved function, and patient satisfaction. However clinical outcomes have been less favorable in young active patients, that lead to the re-development of metal on metal hip resurfacing (HR), with the most successful being the Birmingham Hip Replacement (BHR) introduced in 1997. Evolving complications due to increased metal ion debris has lead to a great reduction of use for all metal on metal (MOM) HR designs, leading many surgeons and patients to look for an alternative surgical selection. This search has focused on the development and use of short stems for THA. One such style of short stems is curved neck preserving designs. This paper will review our French experience with one of those designs.
Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of four surgeons series of a short curved tissue sparing cementless femoral implant (TSI™ Hip Stem, Signature Orthopaedics) for THA. The femoral component was used with two different cementless acetabular styles (Mathys RM Pressfit, and Zimmer Biomet Allofit®). Results on the cups will not be revived in this paper. 150 TSI™ Stems by four surgeons at the same institution utilizing the posterior surgical approach since September 2016. 40% women, average age 66 years with extremes of 27 to 78 years. 10 cases of dysplastic hips, 6 cases of aseptic osteonecrosis, 1 fracture, 1 rheumatoid coxitis, and the rest primary coxathosis, with 7 patients operated on both hips at the same time. 23.3 % have been Dorr type A canal shape.
Results: There has been no aseptic loosing, three femoral components have been explanted due to postoperative infection. There was one intra-operative femoral distal fracture in a Dorr type A bone profile during stem insertion. One posterior dislocation; there has been two patients with thigh pain with pathological bone scan, and one with low back pain and no leg length discrepancies greater than plus or minus 5 mm.
Conclusion: This short curved tissue sparing implant has demonstrated excellent initial short-term results, with excellent implant stability, excellent medial calcar bone remodeling with one dislocated stem, two thigh pain and one patient with low back pain. One distal intra-operative fracture in a Dorr type A bone. This has now been addressed with the use of distal sizing gauges and the use of flexible reamers to open the distal canal prior to stem insertion. Removal of the infected stems demonstrated implant stability with early bone attachment in the proximal porous surface. The high neck resection allows for ease of revision and conversion implanting a new primary conventional length cementless stem design.
There is a short but definitive learning curve in fitting the implant to the femoral neck versus the standard metaphyseal and diaphyseal conventional style stems.
Engh CA Jr, Culpepper WJ, Engh CA. Long-term results of use of the anatomic medullary locking prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:177–184
Polkowski GG, Callaghan JJ, Mont MA, Closhisy JC. Total Hip arthroplasty in the very young patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Aug;20(8):487-97. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-08-487.
Girard J, Glorion C, Bonnomet F, et al. Risk factors for revision of hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 30 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(4):1141–1147
Barrack R,. The Case for Hip Resurfacing: A Bigger Picture. Current Concepts in Joint Replacement Meeting. December 2010.
Amstutz HC. Hip Resurfacing: A 40-year Perspective. HSS J. 2012 Oct;8(3):275-82. doi: 10.1007/s11420-012-9293-9. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
Wong JM, Liu YL, de Steiger R. What is the Rerevision Rate After Revising Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3458-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4215-z.
Clarke I, Lazennec J. Margin-of-safety Algorithm Used with EOS Imaging to Interpret MHRA Warning for 46-48mm MOM Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.15438/rr.5.3.115
McTighe T, Woodgate I, Turnbull A, et al. A New Approach to Neck-Sparing THA Stem. March 2008 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1799.5367, Conference: AAOS At: San Francisco Volume: Poster Exhibit 32
McTighe T, Brazil D, Keggi JM, Keppler L, McPherson EJ. “Short-stem Designs for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Neck Stabilized Femoral Components” In book: The Adult Hip “Hip Arthroplasty Surgery” Third Edition, Chapter 64, Publisher: Wolters Kluwer, Editors: John J. Callaghan, Aaron G. Rosenberg, Harry E. Rubash, John C. Clohisy, Paul E. Beaule, Craig J. Della Valle, pp.823-849
McTighe T, Stulberg SD, Keppler L, Keggi J, et al. Total Hip Stem Classification System. https://doi.org/10.15438/rr.v4i2.70
Schutte D, Conrad J, Romero N, McTighe T. http://www.jisrf.org/pdfs/predicting-total-hip-arthroplasty.pdf ICJR Poster 59 April 27-29, 2012 Coronado, CA
Lindgren JU, Rysavy J. Restoration of femoral offset during hip replacement. A radiographic cadaver study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63(4):407-410.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1529690
Sakai, T, Sugano, N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Yoshikawa H. Femoral anteversion, femoral offset, and abductor lever arm after total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7(1):62-7. DOI: 10.1007/s007760200010
McPherson E, Vaughn B, Keppler L, Brazil D, McTighe T. The Incidence of Dislocation Utilizing a Neck Sparing Stem in Primary THA in Community Based Practices with the Posterior Approach. https://doi.org/10.15438/rr.5.2.106
McTighe T, Brazil D, Keggi J, Keppler L, McPherson E. Short-stem Designs for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Neck Stabilized Femoral Components. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301689235_Short-stem_Designs_for_Total_Hip_Arthroplasty_Neck_Stabilized_Femoral_Components
Van der Rijt A, Van der Rijt R, Solaiman R. Early experience with MSAâ„¢ neck sparing stem via anterolateral approach. Oral Paper at European Hip Society 10th Congress; September 2012; Milano, Italy.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Guillaume Venet, Antoine Tesson, Francois Le Cour Grandmaison, Nicolas Fraquet, Declan Brazil, Timothy McTighe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Agreement:
Authors who publish with the Reconstructive Review agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work. Reconstructive Review follows the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC. This license allows anyone to download works, build upon the material, and share them with others for non-commercial purposes as long as they credit the senior author, Reconstructive Review, and the Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation (JISRF). An example credit would be: "Courtesy of (senior author's name), Reconstructive Review, JISRF, Chagrin Falls, Ohio". While works can be downloaded and shared they cannot be used commercially.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.